Nimble ams standard professional enterprise12/17/2023 ![]() It came with Monterey 12.0 installed, which wouldn’t let me do Time Machine backups, which I consider mission-critical. ![]() I’m running an M1 mini 16 gb with a 512 gb drive. And I don't think it is news or a viable comparison that a small software company is able to provide more direct customer service than big corporation. No I do not work for Avid, (a lame injection at best) because that is not a pre qualification for observing or pointing out subjective contradiction. But they're hardly nimble or accessible when it comes to responsiveness and I'm hardly the first to say it. AVID is a good company I've used for years. Feel free to take it up with them.Īt least they were available and helpful. ![]() I don't know if Apple is "being sneaky", those were Source's words, not mine. They told me where they were in their development process for Source-Connect Standard 4.0, offered an ETA on readiness, and what steps might be taken in the meantime. Those issues of submitting a ticket and waiting days for an email response are well known and have been for years.Īt least Source, like Apple, and unlike AVID answered my call. The issue is less with AVID's slow compliance, but their customer service and communication. I don't care about who is "at fault" for what. And unless you work for AVID, I'm not sure why it matters to you. You don't have to call anyone on anything you don't want to. Apple is hardly being "Shifty" simply because of Source Connect's "short comings" in reaching compliance ? bundled Apple apps work fine on Monterey As well as an entire slew of 3 party apps and plug ins. Īnd given iMovie, Garageband, Logic and Final Cut Pro X et. Too bad about Source Connect but it is in fact their "shortcomings" of being slow to be compliant. If Avid's short comings of slow compliance are Avid's fault, then Source Connects slow compliance is SC's fault. Interesting and a bit hypocritical that you seem to be blaming Source Connect's "shortcomings" on Apple Yet blame Avid's exact same "shortcomings" on Avid. Yes Avid has always been slow to qualify new OS's where significant recoding is involved or new processor architecture, and as I noted given that history, most of complaints are objectively, self inflicted by the customer themselves jumping the gun. I am sure that Mac Pro case is 1500 in just cost.Īnyway, I think the Mac future looks great, and I'm willing to have a little lag time in between. But I expect in comparison to the Mac Pro Intel, the 32, 48 and 64 cores that will eventually come, won't cost what the Mac Pro costs. ![]() Prices will probably be higher in terms of cores and ram of course. That is where I think the premium price comes in. They are already at a kind of "premium" price, but they just continue to work.Īll my Macs still work. ![]() It would be a really bad business move to raise prices. They have much more of the ability to keep their costs within range of many people. Granted we are at record inflation world wide, so that might bring the prices up but honestly, I think Apple has moved into a model of in-house prosumer and pro. I mean, last years iPhone was about the same price and this year it has double the storage. I didn't really see much of a shift in price with the M1's and in some cases, they were cheaper then the Intel's.Īnd I've been seeing Macs being discounted much more often then before. I'm not so sure the next generation is going to be much more expensive. Also I think the next generation is going to be much more expensive. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |